Naked Angelina Jolie poses aged 20 in stunning black and white photos - now selling for £1800 - She ready to Do More Shameless Nude photos for Child Charity
Angelina Jolie as you've never seen her before
Stunning naked photos of a 20-year-old Angelina Jolie have gone on sale in a London gallery for £1800 - showing a whole new side of the actress.
Brad Pitt's wife is seen with her ankles bound, as she shows off defined cheek bones, short hair and a tiny figure in the snaps - now two decades old.
Wearing heavy eye make-up and dark lippy, the star is instantly recognisable by her defined features, but looks a world away from her heavily-tattooed mum-of-six self now.
Staring moodily up, the star flaunts tiny pins and has a gothic look with black nail varnish and scraped back hair.
Kate Garner / Zebra One GalleryAngelina Jolie looks incredible 20 years ago
Have your say in our comments section below
The images, taken by photographer Kate Garner in 1995, are now on sale at London's Zebra One Gallery - giving fans a chance to take home a look at the start of the stunner's career.
Now 40-years-old, Angelina still looks as flawless, seemingly defying age after a hugely successful career.
Kate Garner / Zebra One GalleryThe star shows off her flawless complexion
Leaving the sultry snaps behind, the star has now focused more on her work away from the camera, and recently quit Princess Diana's favourite mine-clearing charity in a row over trustees paying themselves £500 a day.
The Hollywood actress was said to be “extremely uncomfortable” that two trustees had paid themselves more than £120,000 for a “review”.
GettyUS actress and special UN envoy Angelina JolieAngelina Jolie 20 years later and still a beauty
The Halo Trust shot to prominence when the late Princess of Wales visited an Angolan minefield in 1997.
Prince Harry followed in his mother’s footsteps by going to Angola to see its mine-clearing work in 2013. He also served as patron during the Halo Trust’s 25th anniversary appeal.
Jolie quit as a trustee in May last year after tens of thousands of pounds were spent on a review of the charity’s “structural, remuneration and governance arrangements